May 25th, 2010
A little "good" bullying?
Hateful, despicable people often act as apologists for bullies. For instance, corporate attorney Jeff Tannenbaum from Littler Mendelson long ago told the SF Business Times that some people deserve a “little good bullying.” He probably meant to use fear to motivate. That was a foolish thing to say. I ran across a new essay by Anthony Tiatorio (read the May 25 article) in which he thoughtfully represented the stop-student-bullying initiatives as failed. He quoted our WBI national survey prevalence and understood some of the less well-known findings. His conclusion: “the message is unmistakable, ‘get used to it;’ it’s a way of life in this culture.”
Tiatorio argues that bullying serves as a crude “social stabilization strategy ingrained from an earlier clan-based life.” By using violence, the strong eliminate the social outliers, the different ones. Sounds just like social darwinism except that it comes from an advocate of societal ethics. He invokes Greek mythology describing Procrustes who attacked people and had the nasty habit of adjusting the leg length of passersby to fit a bed he had positioned conveniently on the road to Athens. Procrustes shortened legs that were too long and stretched the short ones to fit his arbitrary standard. For some bizarre reason, Tiatorio thinks Procrustes served some important social function. I do not.
However, I do agree that bullying/aggression/violence is infused, perhaps inextricably, in our culture. He doesn’t have faith that school administrators can run their buildings in ways that stop bullying or that laws work. Instead, he believes “this as an educational issue requiring a proactive, early and on-going curriculum response involving children and their families … bullying can only be reduced through broadening our sense of community, knowing that only this can actually stabilize the group and ensure harmony.” Too bad his solution is curricular (as a former teacher) and so obtuse as to be undoable — “broaden our sense of community” — when our society grows more polarized allowing people to de-humanize and demonize others with impunity more every day.
I’m not as optimistic as in my younger years. Without the threat of undesirable consequences looming, people will choose the more expedient course of interpersonal behavior every time — aggression. No amount of bullying is good for society. It coarsens it. We grow cruder and rougher and more adversarial when no laws are present to ensure good conduct that might have been normative previously. So, let’s get real. The reason we work so hard to push for laws (the WBI Healthy Workplace Bill Legislative Campaign) is to have society officially declare that repeated abusive conduct is unacceptable!
Since Tiatoro brought up mythology, who knows which god(s) did good deeds and made peacemakers in the world?
Tags: Anthony Tiatoro, bullying, culture, greek mythology, Procrustes
This entry was posted on Tuesday, May 25th, 2010 at 2:15 pm and is filed under Bullying Tutorials. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

One of the catchphrases used by the people who bullied my family, as well as those “hateful, despicable” people who were the apologists, was “sense of community”. It actually came to mean – fall in line and go along with the neighborhood bullying, pass along the rumors, etc.
So yeah – not a big fan of empty phrases.
We still believe that most children are naturally kind and caring, and stay that way if the adults in their lives model such behavior, but also see that one influential bully can spread misery like a virus.
Thank you for your commitment to this issue.
Dee, The misuse of “community” to connote standardizing everyone and banishing those who do not conform is dangerous. But the author I cite in the piece claims to be a man dedicated to ethics. Paradoxical, to say the least. What it really refers to is the tyranny of the majority and its self-righteous claim to the right to terrorize the less powerful. Call it organizational hierarchy. I outrank you on a piece of paper, so I can mistreat you as a lesser human being. I like Robert Fuller’s “Rankism” as a superordinate _ism to describe an internalized superiority used to smack down others considered less worthy than ourselves. GN
You think people deserve to be tormented, character asassinated, humiliated and assaulted in the workplace and that we should accept that as “new world order”? To boot, those that torment actually have the audacity to conduct classes for juvenile diversion – helping teens that are “broken” from peer torments or torment from home. I don’t think it is justified in any way or something to be proud of actually. The damage done, especially if it happens anywhere from a police department on up to the senate, it is wrong!
Kathlene, We agree completely. The slippery slope of becoming de-sensitized to violence in so many forms leads us to accept torture. We, as humans, have to hold to our moral compass. I presented the arguments of others to show how they preach tolerance of torment while making it sound so practical! No, this is all totally unacceptable. We dare not accept the notion. GN
nice post. thanks.