June 7th, 2009

Trends in HR Anti-Employee Tactics, Part 1

Fact: HR (“human” resources) is a management support service, low-credibility department in medium-size to large businesses. HR is NOT an advocate for employees. The evidence is compelling that the opposite is true. To see what HR is trying to accomplish, pay attention to the most current trends in training and services created for HR.

Here are 3 examples from May-June, 2009 seminar marketing to HR.

“When Employees Strike Back”
“Banish Bullies and their Lawsuits”
“Make Unions Irrelevant”

1) Hyped sales-oriented headline for a seminar “When Employees Strike Back”

Rationale given: “The number of retaliation claims against employers skyrocketed to record 32,690 in fiscal year 2008, resulting in more than $111 million in monetary awards.”

HR skills to acquire: “Learn how to avoid damaging retaliation jury awards”

This is mythical because retaliation claims by employees can be filed only after original claims of discrimination were answered by employer retaliation. You complain that you were discriminated against — sexual harassment or racial discrimination or age discrimination or your disability caused them to mistreat you — and the sham HR “investigation” concludes no wrongs were done. The employer enabled the harassment to happen in the first place! On top of that insult, the employer demotes you, punishes you in some way or fires you for daring to insist on your dignity. So, you can file a retaliation claim.
Retaliation is the employer, often with HR’s guidance, striking down the employee a second time. How can it be characterized as employees striking back? Funny, if it was not a seminar taught by an attorney helping HR keep complaining employees in their place.

2) Hyped sales-oriented headline for a seminar “Banish Bullies and their Lawsuits”
[This is our favorite.]

Actual title of the attorney-led seminar: “Workplace Shootings, Domestic Violence, and Bullying: New Challenges and Legal Threats for Employers”

Rationale given: “More than 71 million American workers are victims of bullying at work, according to a recent study by the Workplace Bullying Institute.” (Wrong! It’s 54 million who have directed experienced bullying. The 71 million includes witnesses. They found the WBI-Zogby survey statistics but can’t cite them correctly.)

“New pending legislation in 16 states that prohibit bullying in the workplace and what these laws could mean for employers” (Wrong again! Here, they cite the history of the WBI-Legislative Campaign which has had 16 states since 2003 with some version of our anti-bullying Healthy Workplace Bill. In 2009, 12 states had active legislation. And they did not bother to mention that the “toughest” versions of the bill do not carry a mandate requiring employers to do anything. They only get the chance to avoid being sued if they create policies and faithfully enforce them — something they should be doing as good business practice voluntarily. Again, too tough for corporate attorneys to read accurately.)

The seminar contents focuses on workplace violence and domestic violence intruding into the workplace and the security risks they pose. The reference to bullying was limited to coverage of “bully bosses” and the legal liabilities they bring to any organization.” Note that they used bullying as a hot topic sales gimmick.

The presenter is an attorney, author of Workplace Catastrophes: An Employer’s Guide to Workplace Violence, Terrorism and Natural Disasters.

If WBI dared to associate bullying with terrorism, we’d be banished. It would imply that employers hire terrorists to do their bidding as bullies. But evidently it’s OK for employers to brand employees they don’t like terrorists.

3) Hyped sales-oriented headline for a seminar “Make Unions Irrelevant”

Actual seminar title: “Minimize the Impact of EFCA and Unions with Powerful HR Communications”

(EFCA, Employee Free Choice Act, is the proposed federal legislation making union organizing easier, the first new labor law in over 30 years in the U.S.)

For this training, the outline of its content is especially revealing (and funny):

– “Communication techniques to win the hearts and minds of your employees by championing your organization’s sound policies and benefits” (Yea, right. Loyalty in exchange for policies that are not enforced and benefits that are disappearing.)

– “Specific internal communications to demonstrate why unions are irrelevant” (This is the union-busting industry’s best seller. It’s the mandated meetings when union organizers announce they want the employees to vote on having a union.

– “How to establish a first line of defense by monitoring the Internet for signs of organizing activity and chatter about your organization — because it all starts online” (The same people who want to win hearts and minds will conduct surveillance, just in case.)

– “How to overhaul supervisory communications immediately, so your supervisors can become advocates for management, listening posts, and experts in interpersonal relations” (This is a very narrow definition of communications skills. Listening is for surveillance purposes only and then only to report to higher ups what is heard and who is affiliating with whom. Are we clear here? It’s snitching.)

– “The grassroots nature of union communications, which focus on emotive language and an emphasis on people over profits” (Yes, that dastardly emphasis by people on people is grassroots by nature, union-driven, and employee advocacy must be struck down.

Readers will find WalMart’s categorization of which employees are “union-prone” equally illuminating.)

Also relevant to union prevention is the report by Kate Bronfenbrenner at Center for Economic Policy and Research. Employers more than doubled their use of anti-union tactics against employees attempting to form unions between 1999 and 2003. Sixty-three percent of employers use mandatory one-on-one, anti-union meetings with employees. Further, 57 percent of employers threatened to close the workplace, 47 percent of employers issued threats to slash benefits and wages, while 34 percent of employers fired workers during union organizing drives. Read the full May 20, 2009 report – No Holds Barred: The Intensification of Employer Opposition to Organizing

So you see from these three examples, HR is about helping management communication focusing on profits and snitching. Nothing about HR need focus on employee rights, dignity at work, employee safety and health. HR works for the employer and must keep the corporate mission in mind – profits at the expense of people. No bleeding hearts need apply for HR.

G. Namie

So tell your HR story here. Please comment.


<-- Read the complete WBI Blog

Tags: , , , , ,

This entry was posted on Sunday, June 7th, 2009 at 9:58 am and is filed under Employers Gone Wild: Doing Bad Things. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Having trouble? Click Here for Comments Guide

Facebook Comments


Disqus Comments

What Do You Think?

Just a short reminder that all blog comments are moderated and should be posted shortly.

  1. HD says:

    I worked in HR at a very junior level.

    I was bullied by my manager and had nowhere to turn. I pieced together, too late, that he is a sociopath. I regret not having kept a diary.

    I am unemployed. He still works there, surrounded by his sycophants, whilst the competent of my former colleagues are marginalised.

  2. Justin says:

    Yeah i found out the hard way that Human Resources is just a orgainzed PR campaign for management, i went to HR when i was being bullied at my job, and i was basically laughed at, i dont need to rehash the bullying here but it was very very sevre and continuned for years until i finally couldnt take it anymore and quit, i have now been out of work for 6 months with no real end in sight, i think human resources have blood on thier hands for protecting the bullies, what goes around comes around i hope the company i worked for fails and those people are out on the street.

  3. Greg Sorozan says:

    Very good article. I work in the public sector. The managers who prosecute grievances still, unfortunately, look to the private sector model for guidance and education. I’ve been dealing with this pattern since I became President of our Union (SEIU/NAGE Local 282). This movement must help change the mindset of all working people. We must help people to understand that “shortcuts” to goals exact a terrible price. And, we must show the true price!

  4. B says:

    I have two bosses. One is a bully and the other says sexually harassing language and tries to touch me. I took my problems to their boss and I was treated like I was joking. Whoever I gave my concerns to ends up passing the problem to someone else in hopes that the situation will go away. With the job situation the way it is, I will not quit!! This matter will be resolved!!

    • MO says:

      I was bullied, maligned,and slandered out of my profession BY THE UNION.
      This all began in 2004, when the business agent began a campaign to run me out of the local.
      Funny, because I was the one who nominated her to her position, after no one else would!( The fact that she was actually voted in, surprised me, since i myself did not vote for her.)
      After a traumatising breakup with what i know now to be a malignant narciccist, i fell into a deep depression, losing ultimately 40 lbs, (i only weighed 135 to begin with.)
      However, i firmly believed that my job and my “brotherhood” would offer enough support and work to help me climb out of this “black hole”.
      Not the case; soon, rumors of crack abuse (which i have NEVER used), theft,(ya can’t get ANYTHING into a 7″chalkbag but your tools and ciggies!), began to circulate, oftimes within my own earshod.
      Wherever i went, there was always some new rumor to allay, some new accusation to live down.
      During this period, another member of the executive board of the local had seemingly become my “champion”, offering both emotional and sometimes monetary support, as calls for work were becoming vitually non existant.

      I was totally taken aback however when this “exec person” informed me that the local had never even processed my original application to the international, and that i, in effect was not only NOT a VALID member of the union, but that each year, when i faithfully paid my dues in toto, was the subject of “one big inside joke at my expense”.
      When inquiries were made to the international regarding my membership status, it apparently sparked an internal investigation of the local, uncovering gross malfeasance, embezzlment, and non adhereance to OSHA standards.
      Unaware of these developments, i still hoped the local would rectify what appeared to be an administrative faus pax, and duly reinstate me to my prior status and seniority. Depressed as i was, i still believed in the general good of my “brothers and sisters”, and that they would not want to lose an established professional with as mant years experience as i possessed.
      Mind you, i had been with this local for over ten years, and in this industry for almost thirty years.
      But the inside tittering and gossip soon turned to outright abusive behaviour and any hopes of further work, as well as remuneration for past dues paid, loss of my insurance and annuities, seemed as tho something i was going to have to just write off.
      This, concommittant with the trauma suffered over years at the mind of my abuser, (who apparently gleefully undertaking his own smear campaign in concert with the business agent), i sank further and further into a severe chrnic, debilitating depression.
      In a last ditch effort to keep my dignity, my home and vitually my life intact, i turned to the NLRB.
      Their efforts on my behalf were friutless, as the union engaged in a concerted collusion, fueling the fears of fellow union members (“this could happen to you, if you don’t go along with the program”)
      Many knew, but not one, including “my good friend’ within the exec board, would step up to the plate on my behalf.He told me “that i just needed to snap out of it and get on with my life, go find another job, outside of the industry.
      I DID finally, after almost a year, find work within my industry, at a non union facility, however, the rumors soon stared to follow, mostly prefaced with the words “you know, she’s suing the union.”
      REALLY!? News to me, at that point, i was living in my van, and was lucky to be able to buy a buck a burger, much less pay for some attorney! (Which i found out, there weren’t ANY attorneys willing or trained to fight the union in a right to work state.) Take that back, i did find ONE, whose billable hours started at $900.00 an hour, not on a contingincey basis.
      Eventually, that job ended, (for reasons that i do not understand, they just said they had to make cutbacks.)
      So, here i am, almost six years later, unemployed and unemployable, battling what has now become a crippling depression and still battling the “she sued the union” onus. Would that i had, would that i could, gee, if life were like TV, some hot lawyer would’ve defended (pro bono) me to the death and i’d walk away with a million bucks, looking like Julia Roberts!
      I can’t take my story to the media.
      The union is IATSE.

  5. Supervisor says:

    Hr asked me to process an inquiry to my subordinates due to a potential viloation – subordinates blames me for their resignations based on their “potential viloation” not iniayed by me but by other department. Now subordinayes retaliates against me without HR protection. Im now harassed by HR with inquiries coming from anonymous letters…

What do You think?

Below is a comment box, we would love to hear any comments or concerns you have regarding this blog post.

For your personal safety please note than anything you write here is public and may show up in a search engine. Do not use any specific names or places if you are concerned for your privacy.

(Maximum characters: 4,000)
You have characters left.

This site is best viewed with Firefox web browser. Click here to upgrade to Firefox for free. X