May 30th, 2013

Pima County Arizona takes a stand against workplace bullying

UPDATE: To write the best workplace bullying policy and enforcement procedures, go here.

On April 16, 2013 the Pima County (AZ) Board of Supervisors approved a new policy to prevent, identify and address workplace bullying. Pima, which includes the city of Tuscon, joins the growing list of U.S. counties (see Fulton County, Georgia) to adopt such measures. You can read the entire policy here.

Bullying defined:

Workplace bullying is intentional behavior intended to create an abusive work environment for an employee or employees. Bullying behavior is behavior in the workplace that a reasonable person would find hostile, offensive, and not obviously related to an employer’s legitimate business interests.

Features of the Policy:

• It can come from any direction — manager, co-worker, subordinate, appointing authority, elected official, vendor, contractor or member of the public.

• Witnesses, not just direct targets of bullying, may complain

• The list of illustrative examples is long, but nicely categorized as follows, bullying: in general, by supervisor, by coworkers, by sabotage and by shunning.

• The examples themselves are excellent. They reflect what really happens to targets.

• Those who believe they are targets of bullying are NOT required to confront their bullies.

• Individuals “exhibiting emotional distress” can be referred to EAP. (Though what transpires there should remain confidential and not discoverable by HR or the County Administrator.)

Weaknesses of the Policy:

• There is a stated requirement that employees and witnesses MUST report incidents. This will help break the silence surrounding bullying, but it also is certain to trigger retaliation for reporting. The policy inadvertently ensures retaliation of workers who might have chosen to remain silent and safe.

• HR is central to implementation of the policy. Managers must report incidents to HR. HR must investigate. HR is instructed to conduct thorough and impartial investigations. Unfortunately, the track record tells another story about HR capabilities.

• The County Administrator (CEO-equivalent) determines fate of alleged bully after HR reports results of its investigation. This is very problematic. The big boss should never have the final say. CEOs are often the executive sponsors for manager-bullies. They have a terrible record of not holding bully-friends accountable. Workers groan knowing that the bully is unlikely to suffer punishment while the target and witnesses are retaliated against.

• Though the definition refers to an abusive work environment where one can infer abuse occurs, the only corrective actions for the confirmed violator are referral to either HR Training (as if a skill deficiency is the only reason for the cruelty inflicted — wonder what training spouse abusers should take?) or to EAP (counseling by employer-paid contractors, the Employee Assistance Program).

• “Appointing Authorities will take appropriate corrective action with any employee(s) found to have violated this policy.” This is deliberately ambiguous which allows each case to be settled without following strict guidelines. One manager may discipline a confirmed offender; another may reward her or him. Adjudication on a “case-by-case” basis opens the door to favoritism, something bullied county workers know all too well.

• A confidentiality clause hypocritically allows the County to gag participants in an investigation while simultaneously mandating that they report bullying incidents. In other words, the mandate is to suffer retaliation only to have HR and the Administrator tell the bullied target and testifying witnesses that they have no right to know either the outcome of the investigation or what consequences, if any, the confirmed policy violator experienced.

Since it’s America, we’re grateful for the County taking these preliminary steps toward a fair way to deal with workplace bullying. The silence has been broken in Pima County.


<-- Read the complete WBI Blog

Tags: , , , , , ,

This entry was posted on Thursday, May 30th, 2013 at 6:30 am and is filed under Tutorials About Bullying, WBI Education, Workplace Bullying Laws. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Having trouble? Click Here for Comments Guide

Facebook Comments


Disqus Comments

What Do You Think?

Just a short reminder that all blog comments are moderated and should be posted shortly.

  1. Jessie McCarthy says:

    Maricopa County needs to adopt the workplace bullying policies that Pima County adopted.
    Maricopa County Community College District has engaged in workplace bullying(which also is abusive) towards employees since 2007 that I am aware of. Myself and three other employees in one department alone were victims. We followed all the procedures outlined in Pima County policy, it didn’t matter. Maricopa County Community College officials and County government offices(including EEOC ) are not properly investigating because of the officials and County employees involved in the bullying. The Maricopa County Community College District governing board is protecting the Chancellor, and Phoenix College President, as well as the head of the Child and Family studies program(just some of the bullies) by not properly investigating the reported bullying. The same with the Arizona Attorney General and current Arizona Governor Doug Ducey. Can you get involved? Myself (my son) and three other teacher’s lives were severely impacted by the bullying and the intentional act of Maricopa County Community College , Maricopa County officials and Arizona officials to not hold the perpetrators accountable.

    • There is no way that WBI can insert itself. In fact the Pima HR guy made a point of dismissing my critique of their policy.

      Of course the Board protected the Chancellor/CEO. Internal channels are woefully inadequate. Perhaps talk to a TV or newspaper reporter.

What do You think?

Below is a comment box, we would love to hear any comments or concerns you have regarding this blog post.

For your personal safety please note than anything you write here is public and may show up in a search engine. Do not use any specific names or places if you are concerned for your privacy.

(Maximum characters: 4,000)
You have characters left.

This site is best viewed with Firefox web browser. Click here to upgrade to Firefox for free. X