Posts Tagged ‘school bullying’
Friday, October 27th, 2017
Burger King and Nobully.org, an organization focused on stopping school bullying, produced a clever test. Which was more likely to compel engagement by Burger King restaurant adult customers — the public bullying of a high schooler by peers or “bullying” a sandwich? Spoiler alert: smashing the sandwich led to complaints 95% of the time, while only 12% of witnesses intervened. Watch until the end to see the care shown by the few who assisted the bullied boy.
Tags: Burger King, bystanders, nobully.org, school bullying, witnesses
Posted in Broadcasts: Video, TV, radio, webinars, Media About Bullying, Social/Mgmt/Epid Sciences, Tutorials About Bullying | No Archived Comments | Post A Comment (
Wednesday, January 22nd, 2014
The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) defines bullying as:
• any unwanted aggressive behavior(s)
• by another youth or group of youths who are not siblings or current dating partners
• that involves an observed or perceived power imbalance and
• is repeated multiple times or is highly likely to be repeated.
Bullying may inflict harm or distress on the targeted youth including physical, psychological, social, or educational harm. A young person can be a perpetrator, a victim, or both (also known as “bully/victim”).
Bullying can occur in-person and through technology. Electronic aggression or cyber-bullying is bullying that happens through email, chat rooms, instant message, a website, text message, or social media.
In addition, the CDC remarked
School-based bullying prevention programs are widely implemented but not always evaluated. However, research suggests promising program elements include:
• Improving supervision of students
• Using school rules and behavior management techniques in the classroom and throughout the school to detect and address bullying by providing consequences for bullying
• Having a whole school anti-bullying policy, and enforcing that policy consistently
• Promoting cooperation among different professionals and between school staff and parents
WBI offers “whole school solutions” that address both youth and adult (workplace) bullying in schools.
Consultants: Dr. Gary Namie & Dr. Matt Spencer
Speaker & WBI Business Development Director: Frank Mulcahy, 713-545-2222
Thursday, November 1st, 2012
By Carrie Goldman, CNN, Oct 31, 2012
WBI Note: This article refers to bullying of children. However, earlier in 2012, WBI conducted a study on the effectiveness of various “fight back” strategies people advise bullied targets to adopt. All strategies are dismal failures. Targets don’t fail; institutions don’t allow them to succeed. Read about our study.
(CNN) — Fall is upon us, and that means the school year is in full swing. Along with the stress of homework assignments and extracurricular activities, unfortunately some students bear an additional burden — bullying. October is National Bullying Prevention Awareness Month, pushing the issue to the forefront of the nation’s consciousness.
Educators and legislators are under pressure to prevent bullying, and many schools are implementing programs such as A Classroom of Difference, Steps to Respect and Positive Behavior Intervention and Supports that teach empathy, interpersonal skills and respect for those who don’t fit into the mainstream.
But not everyone agrees with this approach to managing bullying. There are vocal groups of naysayers who believe that focusing on social emotional skills training and urging students to be accepting of those who are different is leading to the weakening of America. They argue that bullying is really a form of socialization, asserting that kids who do not conform to society’s expectations are bringing on their own troubles.
And when a child does end up being bullied, this same group of people advises that the victims should just fight back.
Tuesday, March 6th, 2012
Adelphi University sociologist and criminal justice professor Jessie Klein (and former high school everyrole — counselor, social worker, teacher) is the breath of fresh air on the school bullying scene with the March 6 release of her new book The Bully Society: School Shootings and the Crisis of Bullying in America’s Schools.
Klein herself wrote the following in an article for CNN, referring to a “culture of misery” found in so many schools:
“Kids routinely speak about one another with racist, classist, and other forms of prejudice that objectify others. Girls get called “slut” and “whore,” boys get called “gay,” white poor people are called “white trash” and the list goes on. Increasing one’s social status by putting others down is par for the course. Broadcasting secrets or sexual images of each other is common and part of the culture of deceit, mistrust and cold clawing for recognition that students learn is necessary for social survival … But individualizing the problem is just another way of avoiding it.“
Wednesday, October 12th, 2011
Everyone already knows of the common stereotype, how bullies pick on the weakest kid on the playground. It is often used to justify the act of bullying itself, like a form of social Darwinism that makes it okay to commit acts of assault on another person. The Workplace Bullying Institute has found in its research that workplace bullies actually target the strongest, most capable employees. Particularly the ones who represent a threat to an incompetent manager’s own job. But a new CNN study shows this is also true of schoolyard bullies in their quest for social dominance.
This begs the question: do these kids grow up to be workplace bullies, or does the workplace make its own class of bullies? Tell us what you think in the comments section.
New York (CNN) — A new study commissioned by CNN’s “Anderson Cooper 360°” found that the stereotype of the schoolyard bully preying on the weak doesn’t reflect reality in schools.
Instead, the research shows that many students are involved in “social combat” — a constant verbal, physical and cyber fight to the top of the school social hierarchy.
To read more visit: CNN study: Schoolyard bullies not just preying on the weak – CNN.com.
Friday, May 7th, 2010
On May 3, Massachusetts Gov. Patrick signed into law (with much fanfare) S2404, a bill that languished until two headline-grabbing student suicides were traced to bullying by other students. Middle school student Carl Walker-Hoover hanged himself in 2009 and high school student Phoebe Prince did the same in Jan. 2010. Legislation was reflexively proposed to hold adults (educators, paraprofessionals, administrators, school nurses, cafeteria workers, etc.) responsible for stopping bullying when they see it or at least report it to the school principal. The principal, in turn, can decide to call or not to call law enforcement.
Tags: Carl Walker-Hoover, Desert Sands Unified School District, Deval Patrick, MA, Phoebe Prince, S2404, school bullying, Sioux City Schools, Work Doctor
Posted in Employers Gone Wild: Doing Bad Things, Fairness & Social Justice Denied, Rulings by Courts | 6 Archived Comments | Post A Comment (